On the Basis of Sex (2018)
Story overview
On the Basis of Sex is a 2018 biographical drama that follows the early career of Ruth Bader Ginsburg as she challenges gender discrimination through the legal system. The film depicts her struggles as one of the few female law students at Harvard and her landmark case fighting sex-based discrimination. It portrays her partnership with her husband Marty Ginsburg and her determination to create legal precedents for equality.
Parent Guide
A historical drama about legal challenges to gender discrimination, suitable for mature children who can understand discussions about equality and justice.
Content breakdown
No physical violence or perilous situations depicted.
Contains discussions of discrimination and unfair treatment that might be upsetting to sensitive viewers.
May contain occasional mild language consistent with PG-13 rating.
No sexual content or nudity depicted.
No substance use depicted.
Contains emotional scenes related to discrimination, career challenges, and family dynamics.
Parent tips
This PG-13 rated historical drama focuses on legal battles against gender discrimination and may be most engaging for children who can understand discussions about equality and justice. The film contains courtroom scenes and discussions of discriminatory laws that might require explanation for younger viewers. Parents should be prepared to discuss historical context about women's rights and how legal systems can address inequality.
Parent chat guide
Parent follow-up questions
- What did you think about the people in the movie?
- Did you see anyone being treated unfairly?
- What was your favorite part of the story?
- How did Ruth feel when people said she couldn't do things because she was a woman?
- What did you learn about how laws can help people?
- Why do you think it was important for Ruth to keep trying even when things were difficult?
- What strategies did Ruth use to challenge unfair rules?
- How did the movie show people working together to solve problems?
- What did you notice about how attitudes toward women have changed over time?
- How does this historical case relate to current discussions about equality?
- What did you think about the film's portrayal of balancing career and family responsibilities?
- How effective do you think legal challenges are in creating social change?
🎭 Story Kernel
The film's core isn't just about Ruth Bader Ginsburg's landmark case—it's about dismantling systemic inequality through incremental, strategic erosion rather than explosive confrontation. What drives Ruth isn't just justice but the quiet fury of being told 'no' her entire life, channeled into meticulous legal craftsmanship. Her husband Marty's support represents the partnership needed to challenge entrenched systems—the personal as political infrastructure. The movie expresses how change often arrives not through grand gestures but through patiently building precedents, brick by legal brick, until the entire structure must acknowledge its own flaws.
🎬 Visual Aesthetics
Director Mimi Leder employs a restrained, almost documentary-like visual style that mirrors Ruth's methodical approach. The camera often frames Ruth in tight shots against institutional backdrops—courtrooms, libraries, offices—emphasizing her isolation within male-dominated spaces. Color palette shifts subtly from muted, institutional tones in early scenes to warmer hues as Ruth gains confidence. The most powerful visual motif is the physical scale of the courtroom scenes—Ruth literally shrinking before towering benches before learning to occupy that space. Costuming tells its own story: Ruth's evolving wardrobe from conservative suits to more distinctive collars mirrors her growing legal identity.
🔍 Details & Easter Eggs
💡 Behind the Scenes
Felicity Jones spent months studying Ginsburg's mannerisms and speech patterns, even meeting with the Justice herself. The Harvard Law School scenes were filmed at the actual campus, adding authenticity. Director Mimi Leder intentionally cast Armie Hammer as Marty Ginsburg to emphasize the physical contrast with Jones' petite frame, visually underscoring how Ruth operated in spaces not designed for her. The courtroom scenes used the actual legal briefs from Moritz v. Commissioner as props, with Jones delivering portions of Ginsburg's real oral arguments verbatim.
Where to watch
Choose region:
- Netflix
- Netflix Standard with Ads
- Amazon Video
- Apple TV
- Google Play Movies
- YouTube
- Fandango At Home
Trailer
Trailer playback is unavailable in your region.
